أخوbrother of الزّوجةthe wife الغرّاthe radiant الذيwho ماتdied جدّهhis grandfather
أخو الزّوجة الغرّا الذي مات جدّه
وقدand indeed ماتdied عنهleaving him behind بعدماafter ماتdied عنهleaving him behind أبْa father
وقد مات عنه بعدما مات عنه أبْ
The brother of the radiant wife, whose grandfather died—
The brother-in-law of the bride, a foolish young man, whose grandfather had died
His grandfather died leaving him behind, after his father had died leaving him.
And he had also died, after his father had died before him
وذاكand that أنّthat الجدَّthe grandfather زوّجmarried off نَجْلَهhis son
وذاك أنّ الجدَّ زوّج نَجْلَه
بأمٍّto a mother لهاof hers جاءتshe came بنجلwith a son ولاand no عَجَبْwonder
بأمٍّ لها جاءت بنجل ولا عَجَبْ
That is because the grandfather married off his son
And the reason being, the grandfather had married his son
To her mother, who bore a son—nothing strange in that.
To a woman who then gave birth to a boy, nothing surprising in that
فيحويso he receives أخوهاher brother ماwhat تبقّىremains لأنّهbecause he
فيحوي أخوها ما تبقّى لأنّه
لِمَيِّتِناof our deceased man نَجْلُson of ابْنِهِhis son فهوso he قدindeed عَصَبْinherited as a residuary heir
لِمَيِّتِنا نَجْلُ ابْنِهِ فهو قد عَصَبْ
So her brother receives what remains, because he
So her brother inherits what remains, because he
Is the son of our deceased man's son, and thus inherits as a residuary heir.
Is a male heir to our two deceased, and he takes precedence
فهذاso this جوابيmy answer مُسْعِفاًhelping فيهthrough it سائلاًa questioner
فهذا جوابي مُسْعِفاً فيه سائلاً
وإنْand even if لمdoes not يُوَفِّdo full justice اللّفْظُthe wording منهof it بهاto it وَجَبْwas required
وإنْ لم يُوَفِّ اللّفْظُ منه بها وَجَبْ
So this is my answer, with which I help a questioner,
So this is my helpful answer to the questioner
And even if its wording does not do it full justice, it was required.
Even if the wording does not fully meet what is required
Sol 6.1