رأيتُI saw فيin الفقهِjurisprudence سؤالاًa question حسناًfine
رأيتُ في الفقهِ سؤالاً حسناً
فرعاًa subsidiary case علىbased on أصليْنِtwo principles قدْhas تفرَّعاbranched
فرعاً على أصليْنِ قدْ تفرَّعا
I saw in jurisprudence a fine question,
I saw in jurisprudence a question fine
A subsidiary case that has branched from two principles:
A branch on two roots that did entwine
قابضُone taking possession of شيءٍa thing برضىwith the consent of مالكِهِits owner
قابضُ شيءٍ برضى مالكِهِ
ويضمنُand is liable for القيمةَthe value والمثلَand the equivalent معاtogether
ويضمنُ القيمةَ والمثلَ معا
One who takes possession of a thing with its owner's consent,
One held a thing with owner consent
And is liable for both its value and its equivalent.
Yet if lost, value and like would represent
Sol 6.1