هَذاthis جَوابٌan answer غامِضٌobscure فيconcerning كِلمَتَيtwo words (of)
هَذا جَوابٌ غامِضٌ في كِلمَتَي
شَرطٍcondition كَإِنlike 'in' ('if') وَإِذاand 'idhā' ('when') مُرادُthe intended subject تَكَلُّميmy discourse
شَرطٍ كَإِن وَإِذا مُرادُ تَكَلُّمي
This is an obscure answer concerning two words
This is an ambiguous answer in my two words
of condition, such as 'in' ('if') and 'idhā' ('when')—the subject of my discourse.
Of condition like “if” and “when” I speak
إِن'in' ('if') أَنthat (apparently intended as 'if') نَطَقتُI uttered بِهاwith it فَإِنّيthen indeed I جازِمٌmaking the verb jussive
إِن أَن نَطَقتُ بِها فَإِنّي جازِمٌ
وَإِذاand 'idhā' ('when') إِذاwhen تاتيyou bring بِهاwith it لَمdid not تَجزِمِyou make the verb jussive
وَإِذا إِذا تاتي بِها لَم تَجزِمِ
'In'—if I utter it, I make the verb jussive;
If I utter “if” then I assert
and 'idhā'—when you use it, you do not make the verb jussive.
And “when” if it comes I do not assert
فَإِذاso 'idhā' ('when') لِماfor that which جَزَمَwas certain الفَتىthe young man بِوُقوعِهِof its occurrence
فَإِذا لِما جَزَمَ الفَتى بِوُقوعِهِ
بِخِلافِunlike إِن'in' ('if') فَاِفهَمso understand أَخيmy brother وَتَفَهَّمِand understand fully
بِخِلافِ إِن فَاِفهَم أَخي وَتَفَهَّمِ
So 'idhā' is for what the young man is certain will occur,
So “when” is for what the youth asserts will happen
unlike 'in'; so understand, my brother, and grasp this fully.
Unlike “if” so understand, my brother, and comprehend
Sol 6.1