فالعَطْفُ لم يَأْتِ في إضْمارِ تابِعِهِ

فالعَطْفُ لم يَأْتِ في إضْمارِ تابِعِهِ

ولا يُخالِفُ مَتْبُوعاً لَهَا ذُكِرا

ولا يُخالِفُ مَتْبُوعاً لَهَا ذُكِرا

So explanatory apposition does not occur with a pronominal dependent.

The adjunct does not imply the ellipsis of its correlative,

Nor does it differ from the word mentioned as its head.

Nor contradicts what it refers to if mentioned.

ولم تَكُنْ جُمْلَةٌ أَيْضاً وتابِعُها

ولم تَكُنْ جُمْلَةٌ أَيْضاً وتابِعُها

والفِعْلُ كَلاَ وَلاَ الْمَجْهولُ مِنْ أُخْرَى

والفِعْلُ كَلاَ وَلاَ الْمَجْهولُ مِنْ أُخْرَى

Nor is it a clause either, or a dependent of one.

It is not a sentence either along with its correlative,

And a verb—no; nor the unknown from another [clause].

Nor a verb, no way, nor a passive from another.

وَلا تَحُلُّ مَحَلَّ الأَصْلِ قَطُّ وَلاَ

وَلا تَحُلُّ مَحَلَّ الأَصْلِ قَطُّ وَلاَ

تَأْتِي بِلَفْظٍ لِمَتْبُوعٍ لَهُ زُبِرا

تَأْتِي بِلَفْظٍ لِمَتْبُوعٍ لَهُ زُبِرا

And it never occupies the original word’s place, nor

It does not take the place of the original at all,

does it come in wording written for the word it follows.

Nor comes with a term for what it refers to, however noble.

وَعَكْسُها صَحّ في الإبْدالِ مُطَّرِداً

وَعَكْسُها صَحّ في الإبْدالِ مُطَّرِداً

خُذْها ثَمانِيةً تَسْتَيْسِرُ العَسِرَا

خُذْها ثَمانِيةً تَسْتَيْسِرُ العَسِرَا

And the reverse of these holds consistently in substitution.

But the reverse is valid in substitution, always

Take these eight, and you will find the difficult easy.

Take these eight, you will overcome difficulty.